The Harper’s Essay” [“Perchance to Dream”] is retitled “Why Bother?” in Jonathan Franzen’s collection of essays “How to Be Alone”. So begins Jonathan Franzen’s famous essay, “Perchance to Dream,” which appeared in Harper’s fifteen years ago this month. The essay. In his now famous essay “Perchance to Dream: In an Age of Images, a Reason to Write Novels,” published by Harper’s Magazine in April,
|Published (Last):||14 October 2012|
|PDF File Size:||12.43 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||9.40 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
One evening a student reported that his contemporary fiction class had been encouraged to spend an entire hour debating whether the novelist Leslie Marmon Silko was a homophobe. In a winter when every house in the nation was haunted by the ghostly telepresences of Peter Arnett in Baghdad and Tom Brokaw in Saudi Arabia — a winter when the inhabitants of those houses seemed less like individuals than a collective algorithm for the conversion of media jingoism into an eighty-nine-percent approval rating — I was yo to think that if a contemporary Otto Bentwood were breaking down, he would kick in the screen of his bedroom TV.
To write sentences of such authenticity that refuge can be taken in them: Ishiguro gives us a character who feels harassed and, despite his acclaim, rendered inadequate by the demands of those around him—reflective of the kind of stress that can accompany the unnatural levels of interaction technology and social media bring.
According to Heath, young readers also need to find a person with whom they can share their interest. On the East Coast, Heath found a strong element of class in this. Franzen also expresses great worry that the spread of this process will make young writers expect only to write within the context of their particular “ethnic or gender identity”, ironically losing diversity of literature by seeking diverse cultural groups’ literature.
There was a siege going on: The reader laughs with the writer, feels less alone with the sting. You almost expect hear him call the boy for another gin.
It is ironic that the focus of this page essay was a return to tragic realism in the spirit of novelists like Charles Dickens and Upton Sinclair. A young acquaintance who had been an English major, when I asked her what she was reading, replied: In recent years, Franzen, now a successful author franzeb his fifties, has made very public peace with Oprah and is capable of presenting himself on the page as a thoughtful, empathetic guy.
The life which men praise and regard as successful is perchanve one kind. Her review found Franzen’s novels as well as his essays to depict a great cultural urgency, but neither find ways of confronting it. A classic work of literature is inexpensive, infinitely reusable, and, worst of all, unimprovable. I would go so far as to say that serious fiction and poetry will survive because of their relative simplicity, not in spite of it.
If we go any further than that, our agendas begin to diverge radically. What do they expect? Joseph Heller had figured out a way of outdoing the actuality, employing the illogic of modern warfare as a metaphor for the more general denaturing of American reality.
Home About Contact Press The book. Writing is a form of personal freedom. Because they command large audiences, TV and magazines can afford to gather vast quantities of information quickly.
On whether this is a good thing or a bad thing, tragic realists offer no opinion. To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: I had a cosmology of silent heroes and gregarious traitors. In his assessment one of his most profound to me of W. But when was serious fiction and poetry ever a mass taste? It was also interesting to recognize that the novel is as much about money as it is about being female — a reminder of the inextricability of economics and gender.
So I began to cut as ruthlessly as possible, and just as importantly to elide plot, to remove connective tissue, to cede control of the perhance to the reader. Then a funny thing happened.
Ti this was a fault of using the first person, a choice that I began to look on with dismay. Franzen’s recognition of these trends, along with the quick rise and cultural saturation of electronic media temporarily left him in despair as to the possibility of universal cultural engagement. Bright Lights, Big-ish City. You might write for yourself, or some ideal reader, but never for a critic. I’d intended to provoke; what I got instead was sixty reviews in a vacuum.
Whitman self-published his first two editions of Leaves of Grass. Combined with the good-but-not-great lectures, the effect of the book was to lessen his importance in my mind. Franzen suspected up to the time of the late-Victorians, novels still had the cultural role pefchance expectations of instructing and possibly constructively affronting social sensibilities; electronic media from journalism to music having taken both these roles, with the rise of visual media and its quick delivery forcing all recognition to a very literal level.
It frees us from the mass identity we see in the making franzem around us.